The Supreme Court Considers L.G.B.T. Rights, But Can't Stop Talking about Bathrooms

Masha Gessen writes on the oral arguments heard on Tuesday, at the Supreme Court, in the cases R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc., v. E.E.O.C.; Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia; and Altitude Express, Inc., v. Zarda, which take up L.G.B.T. rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Masha Gessen writes on the oral arguments heard on Tuesday, at the Supreme Court, in the cases R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc., v. E.E.O.C.; Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia; and Altitude Express, Inc., v. Zarda, which take up L.G.B.T. rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

The Supreme Court Reaffirmed LBGT Protections against Discrimination. How Can We Ensure Those Rights Are Realized?

Corporate Authenticity Prohibits LGBTQ+ 'Pride And Divide' Spending

LGBT rights in Canada - Wikipedia

Transgender Athletes in School Sports

Supreme Court passes on transgender bathroom challenge - POLITICO

US Supreme Court deals blow to gay rights in web designer case

Like Walking Through a Hailstorm”: Discrimination Against LGBT Youth in US Schools

What the Supreme Court's LGBT Discrimination Decision Means for Health Care - Bill of Health

Movement Advancement Project