Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes

Some argue that drones strikes help prevent “boots on the ground” combat and makes America safer, that the strikes are legal under American and international law, and that they are carried out with the support of Americans and foreign governments, while others argue that drone strikes kill civilians, creating more terrorists than they kill and sowing animosity in foreign countries, that the strikes are extrajudicial and illegal, and create a dangerous disconnect between the horrors of war and soldiers carrying out the strikes.

Pros and Cons of Drone Warfare: An In-Depth Analysis

Drone Strikes Abroad - Pros & Cons - ProCon.org

Drone Strikes Reveal Uncomfortable Truth: U.S. Is Often Unsure About Who Will Die - The New York Times

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), Definition, History, Types, & Facts

Russia Continues To Attack Ukraine With Iranian Drones

UAV Technology : Defence & Security : UK

What do we know about drone attacks in Russia?

Rights groups say Obama's drone program violates international law

Drone strikes threaten 50 years of international law, says UN rapporteur, Drones (military)

Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes

Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch Blast U.S. Drone Strikes

Drones target US troops in Iraq, causing minor injuries

Dean R Berry Pro and Con Drones